Terrifier (2017) Review

My History With the Film:
I noticed the artwork for the Terrifier a few times on my Recommended List on Netflix. To be honest, I don’t take many of Netflix’s recommendations to heart, nor do I take a chance on much of their horror offerings. Netflix (and Amazon Prime) has become a breeding ground for unimaginative, low budget crap, so despite having a creepy looking clown on the cover, I had no intention on watching it.

But then something happened last fall over a couple of weeks. A few message boards I browse and my Twitter feed started mentioning the Terrifier. Apparently the film was pretty good, and I found myself needing to escape from life for 90 minutes so I decided to turn on the Terrifier in September 2018 and see what all the fuss was about. The movie did the trick. It’s not amazing or ground breaking, but it’s a lot of fun.

What The Film Is About (Non-Spoiler):
A demented clown torments a small part of town near Halloween.

What I Liked About It:
-Art the Clown is flat out creepy. He’s a clown and a mime, and has wonderful facial expressions and creepy movements. The performance by David Howard Thorton is memorable, and if there is anything to take from this movie it’s that Art the Clown has the potential to be a horror icon and center for a horror franchise.

-The main two characters Tara (Jenna Kanell) and Dawn (Catherine) really grew on me. At first, they seemed like two cliché characters that would be killed off quickly, but over time I grew to really enjoy their interaction and friendship.

-The special effects were pretty good. They reminded me a lot of the low budget horror from the 80’s, but definitely had more polish and detail.

-I enjoyed the music. It was a little weird in spots, but it gave the film a unique feel. None of it was really memorable, but I did enjoy what was put on the screen.

What I Didn't Like About It:
-The first ten minutes of this movie are horrible. I went in blind and had no idea what the Terrifier was and if it hadn’t for the good reviews by a few trusted individuals, I would have turned it off. It’s low budget and has a grindhouse look and feel. In a way it reminded me of watching Clerks for the first time. It took a few minutes to realize that this was the look and the acting I was going to get and I needed to accept it and enjoy the show.

-This film is violent. I went into it thinking it was a simple slasher, and it is, but it’s not afraid to show you all the gore. I can see eighteen year old me absolutely loving this film for all its crazy over the top deaths, but at thirty-four I prefer my horror a little less exploitative. That’s not to say it went too far or was too out of control, but I’m a fan of less is more.

-The first two-thirds of Terrifier is really good, but without a compelling storyline to keep you watching, the chase does grow a little old after a while. If the characters had been fleshed out a little more and introduced a little earlier, it might have kept me on the edge of my seat. Instead, I sat back just waiting to see how they planned to top the previous kill.

-The supporting cast went ranged from damn good (the pizzeria owner) to downright terrible (the pizza clerk.)

Additional Notes:
-Art the Clown was introduced in the short film Terrifier (2011) and was also featured in All Hallows Eve (2013).

I read somewhere that the Terrifier was “a costume in search of a plot” and I can’t argue with that. This movie is basically one very long chase scene and there is little effort put into telling a compelling story or developing characters. And you know what? That’s okay. Not every film needs a perfect three act structure. I really enjoyed my time with the Terrifier. It’s gory and features a very memorable villain. It’s no Halloween, but in a world where we rarely see slashers anymore, I enjoyed Terrifier for what it was.

If you can tolerate some bad acting and a low budget, Terrifier is an easy recommendation from me. It’s a three out of five, and worth your time if you like slashers, clowns, or gore.

Mom and Dad Review (2017)

My History With the Film:
I first heard about Mom and Dad on Horror Movie Podcast sometime in 2018. It was described as an out of control film that really catered to Nicolas Cage’s ability to act insane. I looked for the trailer shortly after hearing this and noticed the film was a black comedy with horror elements that looked like something I might enjoy. It wasn’t a high priority to see it, but I figured I’d check it out sometime or another.

In February 2019, I was browsing Hulu and decided to finally give Mom and Dad a shot. I found myself entertained, but not overly impressed during the course of the film.

What The Film Is About (Non-Spoiler):
Something triggers parents throughout the world to suddenly have an urge to kill their children.

What I Liked About It:
-The film has one great scene where the parents are trying to get to their children at school and are being held back by a chain length fence and some police officers. It reminded me of a zombie movie, but the fact that these innocent looking parents were actually blood thirsty maniacs really created some tension, especially with children involved.

-Nicolas Cage is always great as a crazed maniac and this is no exception. His finest moment comes in a rant about becoming a middle aged man in a flashback. Too bad the lack of a decent plot really made this scene completely irrelevant. Still, it’s Nic Cage ranting about getting ear and nose hair.

-Lance Henriksen… need I say more?

What I Didn't Like About It:
-Almost all of the deaths occurs off screen or are very minor. The budget for gore was obviously limited, however the couple of times it is used it was used well.

-The film spent too much time trying to create a story worth caring about and it fails horribly. Once the movie finally gets going and the craziness ensues, the film is much better off. Sometimes you just gotta know when to say, “This film is just about screwed up stuff and let us show it and allow people to enjoy it without trying to make them feel attached.”

Additional Notes:
-Second film with director Brian Taylor and Nicolas Cage, the first being Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance.

-Some of the school scenes were shot in Louisville, Kentucky.

-Nicolas Cage said this was his favorite movie in ten years that he had filmed.

-Comic writer Grant Morrison makes a cameo.

Mom and Dad wasn’t terrible, but it certainly wasn’t good either. I’d rate it a two out of five and say it’s a rental if you are a huge Nic Cage or Selma Blair fan, and to skip it otherwise.

Pet Semetary Audio Drama Review (1997)

In 1997, BBC Radio 4 aired an audio dramatization of Stephen King’s classic novel Pet Semetary. It originally aired as six thirty minute segments, but can be found now in three one hour episodes freely online, on Audible, or on CD.

Late one night in September 2018, I was driving home from my mother’s rural home when I realized that I had no cell signal. I was forced to fall back to listening to the mp3s on my cell phone when I noticed Pet Semetary was on my phone. I installed it months ago, with an intention of reviewing it, but I had not gotten around to it. I decided to begin the first episode as I drove through the secluded backwoods home and for the first time in years, I felt that uneasy feeling that I was truly alone and in the dark. It’s amazing what losing cell signal can do to your nerves when its nearing midnight and you are watching/listening to something creepy.

I watched Pet Semetary about two years ago, but I haven’t read the book since I was a kid. With this in mind, I’m going to review this audio drama solely on the story it tells and without comparing it to the other formats. I don’t feel I’m fresh enough on either the book nor the movie to give an honest comparison.

Pet Semetary tells the story of The Creeds, a young family who move to Maine so that the husband (Louis) can accept a position as the head doctor at the local college. The family immediately finds itself at home in Maine, with wonderful neighbors and a respectable position with the community.

Down just a few miles from The Creeds home is a Pet Semetary, where people have buried their pets for over a hundred years. It’s an eerie place, that’s even more eerie once you cross the deadfall and discover another open field of land. The Creeds elderly neighbor Jud suggests that they never cross the deadfall, because it’s unsafe.

The Creed’s new home seems perfect, with exception of the busy road that it sits upon. The road is full of trucks going way too fast, and this is why a Pet Semetary can be found so close- animals are being run over all the time. The Creed’s cat Church becomes the latest victim to the dangerous road. Knowing that this will crush their young daughter Ellie, Jud takes Louis up to the deadfall and has him bury the cat. Its then that Jud reveals that the area past the deadfall has magical powers that can bring things back from the dead. What comes back isn’t the same as what dies, but it will be alive.

I won’t spoil things any further, but Pet Semetary is a classic story for a reason: it’s legit scary. The idea of losing a love one and wanting to do anything in your power to bring them back is something I think we can all relate to. Pet Semetary preaches to us that there are things worse than death, and that’s something hard for us to accept. So, Pet Semetary uses horror to show us.

The audio drama is well acted and produced. I felt like all of the voice actors did a wonderful job in their respective roles and the sound effects were top notch. The score was great, although it was overused quite a bit. I wish the composer would have assembled two different pieces of music to really break things up.

The three hour runtime was about perfect for the story, although I felt like the pacing was a little off. The ending came hard and fast, and I don’t feel like it fully developed. However, the final scene was haunting and is something that will stick with me for a while.

I really enjoyed how the drama explained and showed how the evil that lurked within the Pet Semetary manipulated people and things to get what it wanted. It felt so sinister and so out of control.

I honestly don’t have any real complaints with Pet Semetary. I won’t go as far to say it was brilliant, but it was a damn good story and it was well told. If I was to really pry and had to find something to complain about it I’d probably say John Sharian’s (Louis Creed) crying/desperate squeals were a bit too high pitched for my liking and were almost annoying. Luckily, they were few and far between.

I felt like Pet Semetary was great way to spend three hours of my driving, especially at night. I look forward to checking out some more of the BBC’s Stephen King adaptations in the near future.

I’d rate Pet Semetary as a four out of five and say it’s definitely worth a listen.

Director: Gordon House
Louis Creed: John Sharian
Rachel Creed: Briony Glassco
Jud Crandall: Lee Montague
Ellie Creed: Sarah Benichou
Music composed by David Chilton and Nicholas Russell-Pavier
Directed by Gordon House
Dramatized By: Gregory Evans.

Meeting Bruce Campbell and Seeing the Evil Dead 2 Workshed

Back in the mid-90’s, I spent a lot of time online hanging out in the AOL Horror Chatroom. It was in that chatroom that I first learned about many of the horror movies and icons I’ve come to love over the years. It was an unfiltered place of horror admiration and I feel like those hours that I spent communicating and learning is what drives my horror passion twenty plus years later.

The one thing I remember the most about the AOL Horror Chatroom is the flood of instant messages that would follow upon logging in. It would be seconds within your name showing up and random strangers would message you wanting to know if you had a copy of Evil Dead. Everyone was looking for bootlegs because the original Evil Dead had been out of print for years and was one of the most sought after films in the horror community at the time.

I had no idea what Evil Dead was. I recalled the Evil Dead 2 VHS box art because it really stood out on the shelf, but I didn’t recall ever seeing the original Evil Dead in any video store. So, being naturally curious and trying to absorb all things horror, I began to ask around about what made Evil Dead so special. The response I got is probably not too unlike what you’d get today. It’s a wonderful movie that creates an amazing world that is anchored by a strong lead actor. Evil Dead became my Holy Grail and it took me two years to track down a copy, but the movie lived upon to the hype and it became a franchise that I loved. Of course, while waiting for that copy of Evil Dead to find its way into my hands, I watched Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness, and my love for the character of Ash and Bruce Campbell was born.

Fast forward seven or eight years, and being a horror fan in the mid-2000’s sucked. Torture porn was king, the 80’s revival had yet to kick off, and Hot Topic wasn’t selling Friday the 13th t-shirts and cereal. Things were bleak and outside of some quality DVD releases from Anchor Bay, there wasn’t much for old school horror fans to get excited about. So, when I saw an announcement that Bruce Campbell would be making an appearance at Mission Valley Theater in Raleigh, North Carolina, I just about lost my mind. Here was a bonafide horror icon, live and in the flesh, signing copies of his latest book and screening his latest movie, The Man with the Screaming Brain. I wasn’t going to be able to attend the film screening, but I didn’t want to miss out on an opportunity to meet the legend himself so I bought my ticket and showed up an hour early to the theater.

My ticket got me a copy of Bruce’s latest book, Make Love the Bruce Campbell Way and they had a merchandise table set up selling a copy of his first book, If Chins Could Kill. Despite already owning a copy and the audio book, I decided to buy a second copy since I left mine at home for him to sign.

To be honest, things were pretty low key. There were probably a couple hundred people in attendance, and we simply got in line and were walked into a theater where the staff had set up a table for Bruce to sign at in front of the screen. We stood by waited for our turn, and one-by-one walked up to get our stuff signed and have a few seconds with Ash himself.

A few months prior to this signing, I had received a new Kodak digital camera which had the capability to record video. For any young readers, this may sound a little weird, but it was damn near cutting edge technology in 2005. They wouldn’t allow us to take pictures with Bruce, so I decided to ask the usher managing the line if he’d record a video. He was shocked to find out my digital camera could even record video and after a few seconds of instruction, he recorded my nervous walk towards Bruce Campbell and even offered some awkward commentary.

So, you can’t hear what I said in the video, but it was pretty standard fair. Bruce mentioned Brandon was a popular name at one time, and we discussed how he mentioned that in his book. We also discussed the whole etiquette of handshaking at these events and that was about all we got to while he signed my two books. He was nice, professional, and it was a pleasure getting to meet a horror icon.

Fast-forward to 2016 and I found myself invited to Wizard World Chicago. I had just finished watching season one of Ash vs the Evil Dead and the main cast was going to be in attendance. I decided to buy the Bruce Campbell VIP pass, that way I could meet Bruce again and get a good photo with him.

I arrived very early in the morning on Friday, August 19th and I met up with my friends once their plane arrived from Memphis. We toured the town a bit, got checked into the Hilton, and then finally made our way out to the Donald E. Stephen’s Convention Center to see what Wizard World had lined up before the madness was about to begin.

I enjoyed the atmosphere from that first night because we could leisurely walk around, talk, and didn’t have to worry about all the crowds. We also didn’t all three have different photo ops and autograph appointments to keep, so we really did bum around as a group and got to spend some quality time together. It was during this time that I ran across the booths housing Ray Santiago (Pablo from Ash vs The Evil Dead) and Dana DeLorenzo (Kelly from Ash vs The Evil Dead). Both Ray and Dana were having a blast and seemed to be thrilled to be in attendance and I decided to walk over and get a table side photo with Dana.

Now, I’ve met quite a few celebrities over the years, and many of the interactions were mediocre at best, but meeting Dana DeLorenzo was a treat. She was incredibly kind, seemed genuinely interested in talking Evil Dead, and was just a fun, bubbly person to be around. She spent a good fifteen minutes talking to me and I’m one of those people who usually just grab my signature and walk away, not wanting to inconvenience the celebrities. She offered to take two pictures with me and even suggested she choke me in one, which I thought was funny since I had just met Chuck Palahniuk a month earlier who had insisted on choking me. I guess, I just have a neck that people want to choke.

While browsing the convention floor, I also saw that the Evil Dead 2 workshop cabin would be making an appearance over the weekend. This excited me to no end, because just a few days prior to flying to Chicago I was reading about this awesome find. You can read all about it here, but in a nutshell, Evil Dead 2 was filmed here in North Carolina. The filming location is in the middle of an overgrown cow pasture and the original cabin has collapsed. However, the workshed was still in decent shape and standing. Well, the property where the filming took place was scheduled to be harvested for trees, and thus all that remains would probably be destroyed.

Well, one Evil Dead fan made a trip down from Pennsylvania to salvage whatever Evil Dead related memorabilia they could. They meticulously labeled every plank of wood from the shed and then organized it so that they would reassemble it at different locations like conventions.

Being that I had made this Wizard World trip all about Evil Dead, and since I had no idea if I’d ever get a chance to stand next to this movie icon, I immediately placed getting photos at the cabin at the top of my list of things to do. While taking photos and examining everything up close, the guy running the booth let me wear one of his custom chainsaws for a few photos to really make the Evil Dead experience that much better.

The final part of my Wizard World trip was meeting Bruce Campbell again. This took place twice, once for the photo op and once for the autograph.

I stood in line for the photo op for well over and hour, but it was one of my favorite memories of the entire trip. I stood making small talk with a woman in her forties in front of me, who was not what you’d think a typical Evil Dead fan to be. She looked like a soccer mom and was as normal as could be, but deep down inside she loved horror films. We discussed an assortment of movies and then the conversation died down for a bit, I’ll never forget her looking around at the line of people smiling at me and saying, “Yep, these are my people.” It made me feel special and it reminded me of why I love horror movies so much. Sure, the scares are great, but it’s always been about the community for me. We tend to be outcasts and weirdos, and we come from all walks of life, but we all bond over these movies that most of society deems taboo. Like all fandoms we have inside jokes, references only we get, and strong opinions on what is good and what isn’t. But at the end of the day, horror fans tend to be some of the nicest people I’ve ever met in my life, and that’s a statement a lot of people would find hard to believe. My only regret during this experience was not exchanging numbers or social media with that Evil Dead fan. I would have loved to continue our horror movie discussion past that hour long wait in line.

Now Wizard World runs their professional photo ops like an assembly line, which is honestly probably the only way to do it quickly and efficiently. You walk in, make a pose, and walk out quickly. Bruce Campbell however was barking directions when you walk in. He suggests a pose to make and then you do it, smile, and move along. I walked up, and he sized me up, and said, “Big guy, eh? Let’s put up our dukes” and I didn’t argue and my picture came out fine. Not my best photo ever, but it was a nice way to remember the day.

A few hours later, I got a chance to get a photo autograph. I picked an Army of Darkness photo, with Bruce holding up his boomstick. My wait was only thirty minutes this time, and I approached The King and we exchanged pleasantries. He asked where I was from and I told him North Carolina and mentioned how I had met him once before eleven years earlier. He said he remembered that signing, I doubt it, but it was nice of him to say. He signed my picture and I went on my way. Sadly, this was my first big convention and I made a mega rookie mistake. Bruce signed my photo with a silver paint style marker, and I only gave it thirty seconds to dry before sticking it in a plastic sleeve. When I went to pull it out a few hours later, everything smeared and my photo was ruined. I learned the hard way to make sure everything is dry before putting it in plastic sleeves.

It’s wild to think that I watched Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness in 1996/1997, and Evil Dead in 1998. It’s been over twenty years now, that I’ve been a fan and I’ve met Bruce Campbell twice, stood next to the cabin from Evil Dead 2, and met one of the nicest cast members from Ash vs The Evil Dead. Currently, I’m finishing up watching season two of Ash vs The Evil Dead before heading onto season three. I really doubt we’ll ever see Bruce Campbell return to the role of Ash and I can’t blame him, it’s been one hell of a ride so far. I just wanted to share a few of my memories with my fellow horror fans here at 90sHorrorReview.

Here are some additional photos of the Evil Dead 2 Workshed:

This is Horror [aka Stephen King’s World of Horror Review] (1986)

My History With the Film:
In 1986, a documentary called Stephen King’s World of Horror was released. The documentary consisted of interviews with horror directors (Wes Craven, Dario Argento, John Landis, etc) and also featured clips and trailers from horror movies throughout the years. Despite a running time of 270 minutes, Stephen King is only seen in short interview clips for maybe fifteen minutes, and the documentary has nothing to do with him or his work. It’s honestly hard to call it a documentary; since it’s more like something you’d see playing in the background of a Suncoast video advertising films for sale.

In 1989, Stephen King’s World of Horror was cut up into three segments and released on VHS under the name This is Horror. MTV aired the first segment for several years on Halloween and recently I’ve ran across a copy uploaded to YouTube complete with vintage commercials! I was excited to watch what I originally thought was a 90’s horror documentary (despite airing in 1991, this was actually made in 1986), but once it began my excitement quickly died off.

What The Film Is About (Non-Spoiler):
This documentary takes a look at horror and its effect on pop culture.

What I Liked About It:
-It’s always nice hearing some of the masters of horror discussing their ideas and beliefs on the genre and what inspired them to write and create some horror masterpieces. In this documentary, we get to hear from Wes Craven for four or five minutes. Sadly, this is the highlight of the film.

What I Didn't Like About It:
-The only other interview takes place with Bride of the Re-Animator/Society director Brian Yuzna. Sadly, he’s not as well-spoken as Wes Craven and comes off quite pretentious in his segment.

-The remainder of the video consists of trailers and clips from all sorts of horror movies. Stuff like: Rawhead Rex, Lair of the White Worm, The Gate, etc.

I try to put things into perspective when I review them and I can see how this film could have been a game changer for a young horror fan in the mid 1980’s/early 1990’s. This was a time before YouTube and being able to see so many clips from a wide variety of horror films would be a great way to be introduced to the genre. However, as a film, this really friggin sucks. There is no real discussion on the influence of horror on pop culture the only person interviewed with anything worth hearing is Wes Craven.

I’d hoped to go through and review all three This is Horrors (also known as Stephen King’s World of Horror) but I have absolutely no interest in watching another two hours’ worth of poor quality clips. There is nothing new here for horror fans and I’d highly recommend you check out a proper horror documentary like, IFC’s The American Nightmare from 2000 if you are interesting in learning more about horror and its influence in a proper documentary format.

I rate This is Horror a one out of five and a say skip it.

My Bloody Valentine Review (1981)

My History With the Film:
I first watched My Bloody Valentine in May of 2018 (and have patiently held this review in draft status for the past nine months!). I'd seen the remake previously, but never the original. I was set on watching the extended cut, but it's been out of print for years and copies online go for well over $25. One day while browsing in FYE, I saw a copy sitting on an end cap used for $3.99. They had marked it as a copy of the 2009 re-make, because the first date you see on the back of the case is 2009. I was thrilled at my luck and I took home my prize where it sat for six months before I finally got around to watching it.

What The Film Is About (Non-Spoiler):
A small mining town is tormented leading up to a Valentine's Day dance by a miner who was once left abandoned after a tunnel collapse.

What I Liked About It:
-The town of Valentine Buff's felt like a real place. The town seemed like a place you could actually visit instead of someone's interpretation of what a small town is like. This made a huge difference in caring for the characters and believing the tale of the miner.

-The Miner has an incredible look. He's menacing and is truly something of nightmares. I especially love the look of the light that blinds the victims or at least skews their eye sight from what's coming.

-I watched the Extended Cut with all the gore added back in and man what an impressive film this is. I thought the effects were amazing, especially the laundry mat scene.

-The mine scenes have a very creepy ambiance to them and you can tell it's a real mine.

-The cast was great. A lot of them played the dumb teenager/young adult role, but they didn't feel cliché like so many other slasher films from the time period. I think making all the males miners really helped in breaking that feeling of having "the smart guy", "the dumb guy", and "the horny guy."

-One of the scenes I most appreciated came towards the end of the film when Sarah (Lori Hallier) is running around trying to keep Patty (Cynthia Dale) alive. Patty is distraught at the situation and keeps trying to quit on life and complaining. It gets annoying and Sarah lets her have it over and over again, telling her to shut up and dragging her around. It's refreshing to see a horror film where the whiner isn't immediately killed or we are forced to listen to them for a long period of time. I caught myself thinking, "Shut up" and at that exact moment Sarah goes, "Shut up!" I loved that.

What I Didn't Like About It:
-The opening scene contains an almost Three Stooges style joke where all the miners are running for their cars and it was not a good way to begin a horror film. I groaned at how cheesy it was and assumed I'd probably be turning the film off in the next twenty minutes. Luckily, that was a one-off scene and the rest of the film doesn't contain that type of humor.

-I don't factor this into my review, but most of the "extended cut" scenes have no been restored and are in horrible, scratched shape. Watching them placed back into the movie is jarring and its a shame that no one has cleaned up these scenes and made it match the rest of the movie which had a very nice restoration. The effects were amazing for its time and I feel like had they remained in 1981, My Bloody Valentine would had been better received and made a "must watch" by all horror fans.

Additional Notes:
-The DVD contains a twenty minute documentary that does a great job of summarizing the creation and release of the film, along with some quick publicity stuff for the remake. During this documentary I learned that the cast was brought into this small mining town a week earlier in order to observe how small town life existed and to give them time to assimilate into the culture. It works wonders because it's one of the most realistic settings I've experienced in a horror film.

-The movie was shot in Sydney Mines, Nova Scotia because the mine had just shut down and still had all sorts of rustic charm. Unfortunately, once the townspeople heard about the film, they spent $50,000 to clean up and paint the mine, thus ruining the location for the film. $75,000 was spent of the film's budget to restore the mine back to it's dirty and rundown condition.

-The movie was actually shot inside the mine and could only be lit by 25 watt light bulbs which gave the film it's distinct and creepy look.

-The film was created solely to be sold as a holiday horror film. The producers picked Valentine's Day and then gave the direction, George Mihalka, around five months to write a script and film the movie.

-In 2001, George Mihalka approached Paramount about making a sequel, but due to poor box office receipts from the first film, they declined.

-Nine minutes of the film were cut to satisfy the MPAA which was coming down hard on Paramount following Friday the 13th's success. All but one of the gore scenes were found and restored for the extended cut. The one scene not included was an impalement scene that had deteriorated too much. Six additional minutes were lost, but they included no gore or special effects, just character development.

My Bloody Valentine surprised me. It was really good. Sometimes when watching the early 80's slashers I feel like I don't appreciate them as much as others because I didn't grow up with them. But My Bloody Valentine holds up a lot better than many of the others and its a shame it hadn't ever been given the proper recognition and appreciation that it deserves. I doubt we'll ever see a better cut than what was released on the extended release DVD and Blu-Ray in 2009, so if you are wanting to see this film make sure you dig up a copy. The footage looks terrible when added back in, but it provides so much better gore and backstory to the killer.

I'd rate My Bloody Valentine a four out of five, and say it's worth a rental.

In The Mouth of Madness Review (1994)

My History With the Film:
For whatever reason I always confuse The Serpent and the Rainbow and In The Mouth of Madness. I’ve seen them both a few times, but I just struggle remembering which is which. I’m hoping after my most recent viewing of In The Mouth of Madness I’ll associate, “Do you read Sutter Cane?” with the title and a little more and actually keep the films straight.

In the summer of 2017, I found In The Mouth of Madness streaming on Hulu and decided to give one of the John Carpenter movies I’ve watched the least another go.

What The Film Is About (Non-Spoiler):
A fraud investigator is sent to investigate the case of a missing horror writer Sutter Cane.

What I Liked About It:
-Sam Neill (Event Horizon) is amazing in everything he does and this film is no exception. He’s sympathetic and relatable which helps connect the viewer to the insanity that is going on around him.

-There are some genuinely scary moments (the bicycle comes to mind).

-The ending is great. It might be a little Twilight Zoneish but I love that about it. It’s hard to believe this movie was funded by a major studio since the viewer’s perception is twisted and contorted the last twenty minutes until you feel intense frustration and even fear.

-The soundtrack is great, but then again, when is a John Carpenter soundtrack not great?

-I’m not a huge fan of movies with flashbacks, flash forwards, and repeated scenes. However, In The Mouth of Madness uses these filmmaking techniques to disorientate the viewer which works within the plot of the movie.

What I Didn’t Like About It:
-They mention Stephen King once or twice, but you almost feel like this is a movie written about Stephen King himself which is interesting. I feel like King should have had something to do with this if they were going to use him for a model and it bothers me that he did not.

-The ending may not be for everyone. I actually watched it twice this go around just to really appreciate all that is going on.

-The supporting cast is quite weak including Julie Carmen (Fright Night 2) and Jürgen Prochnow (Beverly Hills Cop 2) who I simply don’t buy into being Sutter Cane.

Additional Notes:
-This is the third film in John Carpenter’s Apocalypse Trilogy: The Thing, Prince of Darkness, and In The Mouth of Madness.

-The movie is filled with H.P. Lovecraft references and quotes.

I enjoyed In the Mouth of Madness and find it a great way to spend a couple of hours. It’s not a perfect film and the ending can be a little chaotic, but if you like movies that screw with your mind and your perception then I think you’ll like this film.

I rate In The Mouth of Madness a three out of five and say it’s a rental.